|
May 2014
This is not just another
T-amp review. For starters the Temple Audio Monoblock amplifiers are not
strictly T-amps as they are not designed for Tripath silicon. Maybe the 'T' in
class T means Temple in this case so this could be a T-amp review after all! I
used both Monoblock and Stereo versions of the Temple Audio amplifiers but
focused mainly on the Monoblocks. The intent behind this article to relay some
real world experience about getting the best out of these mini-powerhouses and
to cover the power options I tried. I can't promise that in your system you'll
hear exactly what I heard but it will give some pointers as to what you can try
for yourself. Just about everyone will be familiar with T-amps - amplifiers based around Tripath chips. Tripath folded in 2007 though supplies of the chips are still available, it's not clear if someone is still producing the Tripath silicon range as supply is plentiful. Temple Audio takes their own route by using an Analogue Devices chip at the heart of their amplifiers. Another unusual Temple Audio aspect is that these amplifiers are not sourced from the Far East; they are developed and manufactured in the UK including locally produced powder coated metalwork and high quality circuit boards. The Monoblocks are not surprisingly only
available as power amps; they are priced at £329.99 (around $532 USD) for a
pair. There is a Stereo amplifier version named the Bantam Gold, this is
available with volume control for £189.99 (around $306) or without volume
control for £179.99 (around $290). All amplifiers are single input and at these
prices come with a switched mode power supply but they can be purchased for a
small saving without the power supply. According to Temple Audio the switched
mode power supplies are very carefully chosen for low noise and good power
delivery. The stereo Bantam Gold is rated at 25 Watts per
channel with 0.005% distortion running from a 15 Volt power supply. It has two
input sensitivities; the low sensitivity setting is 1V for full output with the
high sensitivity setting being 125mV. The Monoblocks run off 18V and are rated
at 40 Watts @ 0.005% distortion; they are implemented to give greater power than
the stereo amplifier and for their party trick they can drive loads as low as 2
Ohms, Quad ESL owners take note! Some monoblock T-amps are simply one channel of
a stereo chip; Temple goes the extra mile by properly paralleling the two
channels on the chip. The Monoblock has four input sensitivity levels with the
lowest and the highest settings being the same as those of the Bantam Gold, so
the Monoblocks have an extra two settings between the Gold's two extremes. The
amplifiers are sensibly optimized for a 6 Ohm load. The amplifiers are very
diminutive and solid too. The chassis is powder coated and hard wearing, the
Monoblocks are a little smaller than the Gold. The objective was to run a few configurations of
the Temple Audio amplifiers with my high sensitivity open baffle speakers and
well as with some more "normal" speakers. I've run the stereo Bantam Gold on and
off for around a year, comparing it to a 300B SE amplifier equipped with fabled
Western Electric tubes. I compared the Temples with some other tube and solid-state
amplifiers I had to hand but the 300B amplifiers I feel are the most useful
comparison Two Monoblock amplifiers As you can see from the above list that I had quite a number
of combinations to try.
Supplying
The Power Time
now to experiment with non-standard power supplies. I had been using the stereo
Bantam Gold on and off for over a year, this was mostly with the Ordo linear
regulated power supply which has an adjustable regulator which will reach around
14V. The Ordo made the sound lusher with improved soundstage and better
resolution so this was perfect in my mind…but my mind does tend to wonder what
other possibilities exist. One possibility I didn't get to try was a
non-regulated linear supply. You can DIY this easily with a hefty transformer,
hi-spec diodes and capacitors. One thing to watch is that the power supply
outputs the intended voltage. The transformer you choose has a big impact on the
final voltage due to its regulation specification so please to be careful to
research this if you go down this route. Two transformers with the same
secondary voltage specification can give quite different voltages if their
regulation specification differs; the final voltage depends on the load they
see. Don't exceed 18V supplying a Bantam Gold or Monoblocks, I believe the
absolute maximum for the chip is 20V but this is based on Temple's experience,
there will be no warranty for over 18V. Being really rather content with the Ordo regulated linear
power supply I hadn't got around to trying battery power until quite some time
had passed. I should have tried this fairly well trodden path much sooner. I
bought myself a couple of YUASA NP7-12 sealed lead-acid (SLA) 12V batteries. To
these I attached a flying leads with 3 Ampere fuse and the required 2.1mm DC
plug, the centre of which is the positive connection. Running
now with the SLA batteries (one per amplifier) I gained resolution and yet more
authority and presence. If there was a downside it was that any nasties such as
spittyness or harsh strings became more apparent. It's not that they are
emphasized; it's simply that there is a greater clarity so harshness on
recordings can be more exposed. You can have a lower resolution "nice" sound
with a lesser power supply or go with SLA battery to hear what a recording is
really made of. SLA battery is without doubt my choice and is what I used for
the rest of my listening. I found that one battery per amplifier was better than
sharing a battery between amplifiers, my guess with that one battery per
amplifier keeps grounds apart and this provides a benefit though this will be
system dependent. Note that if you need the full 40W of the Monoblocks you will
need to provide them with a full 18V, not the 12V of typical SLAs. 18V is
possible with batteries but it will take some hunting around to find suitable
batteries.
The
Amplifiers The signature of the Bantam Gold and Monoblock configurations was consistent but that's not to say they sound the same; they didn't. Comparing my 300B SE monoblocks I felt these were a little more expressive and smoother in the mid-range than single Bantam Gold. The 300B tubes in use were Western Electric so the Bantam Gold had some really stiff competition, indeed it doesn't get much tougher. In terms of cost I should point out that the 300B amplifiers had within them capacitors each costing about the same about one stereo Bantam Gold. A similar 300B amplifier purchased today would cost around $2000 to $3000 with WE300Bs costing several hundred dollars on top of that, then you have the exotic capacitors. A similar specification 300B amplifier to mine would easily set you back $4000. The Bantam Golds should be thought as more neutral sounding
than the pleasantly euphonic 300Bs. For the mid-range there's arguably a small
victory for the 300Bs but this depends on whether you're happy with some euphony
versus neutrality. In the bass department there's clear water between the
amplifiers with the Bantam Gold easily being the winner with deeper, tighter,
more dynamic and fuller sounding bass. This was a resounding victory for the
Bantam Gold. The treble was pretty much a dead heat with both being wispy when
required and accurate sounding. In terms of mid-range and treble resolution
there was little to choose between the amplifiers but in the bass there was
significantly greater resolution and texture displayed by the stereo Bantam Gold
amplifier.
Stereo
Amplifiers Bi-Amp'ed The gains I heard due to bi-amp'ing with two stereo amps were obvious in my setup, there was greater resolution, I could hear deeper into the mix, and there was also a greater authority and presence. The downside is that the extra resolution can be brutally revealing so be careful what you wish for; the ultimate in resolution is great with excellent recordings but I have plenty of great music which is less than greatly recorded. Considering the low cost of these amplifiers it is sensible to try bi-amp'ing. If you end up with a spare amplifier I'm sure you'll find a use for it. You could easily spend a load more money buying an interconnect or mains cable for far less benefit.
Monoblock
Amplifiers A lot of enthusiasts will have heard Tripath TA2020 based
amplifiers so it's useful to contrast the Temple Audio Monoblocks with what I
regard as the house sound for the low-cost versions of the T-amps in relatively
standard guise. The TA2020 amplifiers I find can work rather well with what I
would characterize as slightly lazy speakers, the TA2020s spice these up with
their inherent speed and attack. In absolute terms my Visaton Topaz speakers are
just a little relaxed and benefit somewhat from the TA2020 liveliness which
bring attack to the leading edges of notes and impress with their transients. I
find though even with the Topaz the TA2020 amps after a while sound over-hyped
and strangely over-energetic, too much of a good thing. It's rather like being
impressed by bright tweeters at a demo; after while you realize that long-term
listening is going to be tiring. The TA2020 effect with my more transparent open
baffle speakers was fun for a while with the Arjen being closer to my taste but
even this was a little too intense. Of course there are speakers such amplifiers
will synergize with well. Injecting the Temple Audio Monoblocks into my system
fixed the over-hyped TA2020 sound; these Analogue Devices-based amplifiers are
much more balanced and refined. Yes, they are still tight and fast with a
remarkably solid bass too but thankfully these characteristics are within the
bounds of what a good amplifier should sound like. I found the Monoblocks a useful step up from the stereo Bantam
Gold, they exhibit much the same personality but just more of it and if anything
area richer listen plus being a little more direct sounding. The difference is
not huge and in some systems the differences will not be noticeable. Comparing
the Monoblocks to my 300B SE amplifiers with WE tubes it was clear the
Monoblocks were more resolving and neutral with an impressively powerful and
tighter bass. The Monos lost none to the texture of the tube amps either. Where
I noticed the most difference between tubes and chips was in the soundscape
& imaging. The tubes produced bigger individual images with extra presence
but lost out in terms of resolution. Some of the Monoblocks' speed was missing
with the tubes but I felt this wasn't a big issue. I found that my tube phono
stages worked better with the 300B power amplifier and the solid-state iFi
iPhono and Ray Samuels Nighthawk phono stages gelled better with the Temple
Audio Monoblocks.
The
Result
Specifications
Company Information Voice: Telephone: +44 7717 536254
|
|